Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)MIT(dot)EDU>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with
Date: 2003-08-29 13:56:45
Message-ID: 87r834in36.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Greg Stark <gsstark(at)MIT(dot)EDU> writes:

> [On that note, one of my pet peeves is that the default names for constraints
> are of the form $1 which requires quoting, but that \d doesn't quote them so
> that you can almost but not quite copy the \d output into an sql statement
> recreating the constraint.]

Oh look, that's already better in 7.4. It's hard to keep up with you guys.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Schoebel-Theuer 2003-08-29 14:01:54 Re: Obscure: correctness of lock manager???
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-29 13:35:08 Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version