Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Date: 2006-02-16 18:03:59
Message-ID: 87r7632nao.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Egad :-(. At least the SQL spec has some notion of wanting the answer
> to a query to be well-defined ...

Yeah, the MySQL interpretation of this is basically as a shorter form of
Postgres's DISTINCT ON syntax. There's something to be said for MySQL's which
doesn't introduce an orthogonal syntax to GROUP BY with basically equivalent
meaning, but there's a lot to be said for having a syntax that you can't write
by accident as well.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ken Winter 2006-02-16 18:48:11 Re: Does PG really lack a time zone for India?
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2006-02-16 17:43:41 Re: address matching and verification