Re: Quality of email postings

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:

> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>
>>> I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the
>>> advocacy list. It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and
>>> that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions. I am
>>> thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track,
>>> and more focus in emails.
>>
>> I propose that we restrict advocacy to be writable by only the www team.
>> Everyone else can send their suggested posts to them and they can edit them
>> and post them. That way the discussions will represent only a professional
>> appearance and we can avoid having porn posted on the advocacy mailing list.
>
> I can only assume that this is a joke but with Greg I can never tell. :P

A more biting insult I've never seen :(

I'll have to try harder to be more outrageous in future.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com