From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TODO item |
Date: | 2009-03-28 15:45:58 |
Message-ID: | 87r60hd51l.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> 1) select ... from foo, unnest(foo.bar); -- UNNEST is implicitly LATERAL
[...]
>> It's point (1) that's the killer - without it, unnest() is just a
>> trivial shorthand for stuff that can be done anyway; it doesn't
>> actually add any functionality.
Bruce> OK, so what should the TODO wording be?
Under "SQL Commands":
* implement LATERAL (and corresponding UNNEST functionality)
(LATERAL is, I suspect, a fairly big project because of the amount of
planner work involved, but it's also a fairly high-value project
because (a) it's useful (we usually get a couple of cases every week
on the IRC chan where people ask "how do I do X", where X would be
trivial with LATERAL but requires complex and often inefficient SQL
without it), and (b) it potentially presents optimization
opportunities even for queries that don't use it.)
--
Andrew.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-03-28 16:06:47 | Re: 8.4 open items list |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-03-28 15:35:01 | Re: TODO item |