Amit Kapila writes:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de> wrote:
>> This sounds like it should work to capture more context when the
>> Assertion fails the next time.
>
> Sounds good. So can we assume that you will try to get us the new report
> with more information?
Ja. I do have a busy weekend+week ahead though, so no holding of
breath.
regards
Andreas