| From: | Nic Ferrier <nferrier(at)tapsellferrier(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a ResultSet for a refcursor element. |
| Date: | 2002-10-10 18:24:06 |
| Message-ID: | 87ptui17ax.fsf@pooh-sticks-bridge.tapsellferrier.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> Dave,
>
> True, but that has nothing to do with refcursor's. refcursors and SRFs
> (set returning functions) are two different features. I thought this
> thread was all about refcursors, so I am still unsure what Nic meant by
> the comment below.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Alledgedly 7.3 now supports returning result sets from a function
> >
> > Dave
> > On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 11:33, Barry Lind wrote:
> >
> >>Nic,
> >>
> >>What do you mean by "the CallableStatement handling is not setup yet"?
> >>Current code should support CallableStatements such that the example you
> >>give should work (except of course for returning a ResultSet object :-)
On my machine it fails. I just built 7.3 out of CVS. I presume there
is a bug somewhere. I'll take a look at it and give you an update.
Nic
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brett | 2002-10-10 18:35:02 | Re: Taking advantage of prepared statement performance |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2002-10-10 17:48:02 | Re: Taking advantage of prepared statement performance |