| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com |
| Cc: | Cristóvão Dalla Costa <cbraga(at)bsi(dot)com(dot)br>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, stephen(at)cass-ltd(dot)co(dot)uk, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Two Phase Commit support |
| Date: | 2002-10-28 23:19:02 |
| Message-ID: | 87pttuywwp.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com writes:
> I agree with Cristóvão. Also, two-phase commit only makes sense in the
> context of multiple database servers which are replicating to each other in
> real time. Once postgresql has replication in place then they should
> probably start considering two-phase commit; unless they decide to roll out
> both at once of course. ;-)
The Pgreplication project is in the process of implementing a new
eager, multi-master replication design that should be a lot more
scalable than 2PC -- see here for more info:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/330257.html
BTW, the Pgreplication homepage is here:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgreplication/projdisplay.php
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2002-10-28 23:23:04 | Re: comamnds |
| Previous Message | Medi Montaseri | 2002-10-28 23:16:51 | Re: Two Phase Commit support |