From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: command |
Date: | 2002-11-08 15:14:32 |
Message-ID: | 87pttggkkn.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> On 8 Nov 2002 at 11:03, Florian Litot wrote:
> > yes it's good but can i have the date with each line?
>
> Err.. I don't think so.
Try the log_timestamp GUC option.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dag | 2002-11-08 17:21:25 | Re: explaining union |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-08 14:54:53 | Re: command |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | culley harrelson | 2002-11-08 15:20:00 | identifying duplicate RI triggers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-08 15:11:45 | Re: column names from temporary tables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Reinhard Max | 2002-11-08 15:36:33 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.3b5 Packaged for Testing ... |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-11-08 15:07:51 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a |