Re: command

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: command
Date: 2002-11-08 15:14:32
Message-ID: 87pttggkkn.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> On 8 Nov 2002 at 11:03, Florian Litot wrote:
> > yes it's good but can i have the date with each line?
>
> Err.. I don't think so.

Try the log_timestamp GUC option.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

  • Re: command at 2002-11-08 10:14:26 from Shridhar Daithankar

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dag 2002-11-08 17:21:25 Re: explaining union
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-08 14:54:53 Re: command

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message culley harrelson 2002-11-08 15:20:00 identifying duplicate RI triggers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-08 15:11:45 Re: column names from temporary tables

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reinhard Max 2002-11-08 15:36:33 Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.3b5 Packaged for Testing ...
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2002-11-08 15:07:51 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a