Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints (resend)

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: jao(at)geophile(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints (resend)
Date: 2004-06-11 20:12:48
Message-ID: 87pt85zwe7.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

jao(at)geophile(dot)com writes:

> Does anyone have any experience in modifying the priority of the
> checkpoint process itself, (re-nicing it)?

Unfortunately for you, re-nicing doesn't generally affect a processes
I/O rate--it's meant for CPU-bound processes.

It might be possible to add code to "throttle" the checkpoint process
(similar to what was done for VACUUM) but I don't know for sure...

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-11 20:42:19 Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints (resend)
Previous Message jao 2004-06-11 19:55:14 Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints (resend)