Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3
Date: 2007-06-18 21:45:25
Message-ID: 87ps3trl6y.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:

> Would someone please explain why we are considering this so far past
> features freeze, and who suggtested that the 8.3->8.4 upgrade being a binary
> upgrade was anything more than a pipe dream?

Simon just updated a patch he had originally submitted over a year ago.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Perry, Lance 2007-06-18 23:10:35 PostgreSQL Developer needed in San Diego
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-18 21:40:58 pgsql: Arrange for quote_identifier() and pg_dump to not quote keywords