Re: Performance of update

From: Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo(at)ttmail(dot)com>
To: sam <sam(dot)mahindrakar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance of update
Date: 2008-03-27 11:06:01
Message-ID: 87prtg2zqe.fsf@alamut.mobiliz.com.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, sam <sam(dot)mahindrakar(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Iam trying to update a database table with approx 45000 rows. Iam not
> updating all rows at a time. Iam updating 60 rows at a given time for
> example. and this is happening in a FOR LOOP. A function that has the
> update statements is called within the loop.
>
> The updates take too long.....is postgres slow in doing updates on
> large tables or is it because of the function call within the loop???

Are there any ON UPDATE CASACADE and FK consistency checks on the
table. Are related columns used during UPDATE INDEXed appropriately?
It'd be helpful if you can supply your table schema and UPDATE query
string.

Regards.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2008-03-27 11:11:48 Re: Performance of update
Previous Message Alain Roger 2008-03-27 10:25:18 Re: returned value from SQL statement