Re: renaming "storage parameters"

From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: renaming "storage parameters"
Date: 2009-02-09 18:51:12
Message-ID: 87prhrigv3.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Alvaro Herrera:

> Euler Taveira is arguing in an autovacuum thread that we should give
> "storage parameters" a different name; his argument is that
> "autovacuum_enabled" is not really a parameter that relates to storage.
> He is proposing "relation parameters".

They also apply to indices, right? I think it's a bit odd to call
those "relations" (but there's precedent inside PostgreSQL), so it's
just replacing one strange terminology with another.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-09 18:59:45 Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-02-09 18:44:57 Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables