Re: 8.4 Performance improvements: was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.4 Performance improvements: was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: 2009-03-13 13:57:06
Message-ID: 87prgl4jbh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


A minute ago I said:

AFAIK Opensolaris doesn't implement posix_fadvise() so there's no benefit. It
would be great to hear if you could catch the ear of the right people to get
an implementation committed. Depending on how the i/o scheduler system is
written it might not even be hard -- the Linux implementation of WILLNEED is
all of 20 lines.

I noticed after sending it that that's slightly unfair. The 20-line function
calls another function (which calls another function) to do the real readahead
work. That function (mm/readahead.c:__do_page_cache_readahead()) is 48 lines.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jignesh K. Shah 2009-03-13 14:56:45 Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2009-03-13 13:54:09 Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4