From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Rikard Falkeborn <rikard(dot)falkeborn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Suspicious strcmp() in src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c |
Date: | 2019-04-10 22:33:35 |
Message-ID: | 87pnptwl1a.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
>>>>> "Rikard" == Rikard Falkeborn <rikard(dot)falkeborn(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
Rikard> In src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c the following snippet of code is found
Rikard> (lines 3238-3242, rev 765525c8c2c6e55abe):
Rikard> if (strcmp(*nodename, "+") == 0 ||
Rikard> strcmp(*nodename, "-")) // <-- notice the lack of comparisson
Rikard> here
Rikard> group = 0;
Rikard> else
Rikard> group = PREC_GROUP_PREFIX_OP;
Rikard> Should the second part of the || be strcmp(*nodename, "-") ==
Rikard> 0?
Yes it should.
The effect of this bug is to produce a false operator precedence warning
when those are enabled, like so:
postgres=# set operator_precedence_warning = on;
SET
postgres=# select -random() is null;
WARNING: operator precedence change: IS is now lower precedence than -
when in fact "-random() is null" always did parse as "(-random()) is null"
making the warning spurious.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-10 22:43:32 | Re: Suspicious strcmp() in src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c |
Previous Message | Rikard Falkeborn | 2019-04-10 21:40:53 | Suspicious strcmp() in src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c |