From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Prepared statement performance... |
Date: | 2002-09-26 03:40:17 |
Message-ID: | 87ofalwh9a.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> writes:
> Any chance to get a patch that could be applied over a 7.2 source?
I'm not planning to -- but since the PREPARE/EXECUTE stuff is almost
entirely separated from the rest of the system, it would probably be
pretty easy to do.
> >Note that in 7.3, functions can return sets of tuples.
> Yeah... I know that... But, same comment as above applies - the
> migration is what scares the hell out of me :-(
FYI, backpatching this to 7.2 would not be feasible.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-26 03:55:56 | Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-26 03:28:19 | Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vernon Wu | 2002-09-26 06:48:14 | Is the JDBC driver i18n compatible? |
Previous Message | Dan Robinson | 2002-09-25 22:05:46 | Problems with the size of a select parameter? |