Re: tweak CREATE SEQUENCE grammar

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tweak CREATE SEQUENCE grammar
Date: 2002-10-02 14:45:32
Message-ID: 87ofacew6r.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Neil Conway writes:
> > Can you point me to where in the standard these are defined? (I looked
> > briefly but couldn't find it.)
>
> The current value is set with ALTER SEQUENCE name RESTART WITH value;
> (11.63).

Great, thanks for the info.

> "serial" columns are defined like
>
> foo int GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY [(sequence options)]

Wow, that's verbose. I suppose it's still worth supporting, but you've
got to wonder how the committee every arrived at that syntax...

Since it seems the SQL 200x stuff has the same semantics as the
sequences we already have, I think this patch is still suitable for
application (I'll fix some more of the syntax stuff later, I'll
definately have time before 7.4) -- Bruce, can you add this back to
the queue for 7.4?

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-02 14:55:28 Re: tweak CREATE SEQUENCE grammar
Previous Message Alexey Borzov 2002-10-02 09:44:16 another attempt at fixing contrib/rserv...