"Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> A vacuum analyze that used to take about 3 minutes on a table of about
> 4 million rows is now taking up to 25 minutes. I changed the
> statistics on two index columns to 100 recently, to improve planner
> estimates. Could this have something to do with the lack of speed?
That sounds about right. It's sampling 10x as much of the table and it's
taking almost 10x as long...
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com