Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Date: 2018-07-23 16:32:20
Message-ID: 87o9exhq1x.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

Tom> As I said before, I think that we should change the existing
Tom> contrib modules to be coded likewise, all using a single -I switch
Tom> that points at SRCDIR/contrib. That'd help give people the right
Tom> coding model to follow.

I don't see that playing nicely with PGXS?

--
Andrew.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2018-07-23 16:33:57 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Previous Message Nico Williams 2018-07-23 16:27:49 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?