Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java?

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java?
Date: 2003-12-11 14:23:54
Message-ID: 87n09zqvph.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:

> Jokes and facts aside, I can't help it to think how better it would
> have been, if postgresql was in C++. We could easily plug multiple
> implementations of underlying subsystems without mucking much in base
> code..

That's easy to do in any language if your code is carefully designed
for it (look at the Linux kernel for an example in C) and hard to do
even in C++, if the design isn't suited. So your assertion that C++
would have magically enabled "pluggabilty" doesn't hold water.

> Wild thought anyways..

Indeed.

-Doug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nagib Abi Fadel 2003-12-11 14:36:56 Should we consider empty fields as NULL values when dealing with string columns ?
Previous Message Chris Travers 2003-12-11 14:15:57 Re: Should we consider empty fields as NULL values when