| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java? |
| Date: | 2003-12-11 14:23:54 |
| Message-ID: | 87n09zqvph.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:
> Jokes and facts aside, I can't help it to think how better it would
> have been, if postgresql was in C++. We could easily plug multiple
> implementations of underlying subsystems without mucking much in base
> code..
That's easy to do in any language if your code is carefully designed
for it (look at the Linux kernel for an example in C) and hard to do
even in C++, if the design isn't suited. So your assertion that C++
would have magically enabled "pluggabilty" doesn't hold water.
> Wild thought anyways..
Indeed.
-Doug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nagib Abi Fadel | 2003-12-11 14:36:56 | Should we consider empty fields as NULL values when dealing with string columns ? |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2003-12-11 14:15:57 | Re: Should we consider empty fields as NULL values when |