From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP |
Date: | 2005-03-14 04:24:18 |
Message-ID: | 87mzt67t3h.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 21:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Comments? Can anyone confirm whether DB2 or other databases allow
> > ungrouped column references with HAVING?
Mysql treats ungrouped columns as an assertion that those columns will all be
equal for the group and it can pick an arbitrary one. Essentially it does an
implicit "first(x) AS x". The expected use case is for things like:
select count(*),a.*
from a,b
where a.pk = b.a_fk
group by a.pk
I've noticed quite frequently scenarios where this idiom would be very handy.
I usually either end up rewriting the query to have nested subqueries so I can
push the grouping into the subquery. This doesn't always work though and
sometimes I end up listing several, sometimes dozens, of columns like
"first(x) AS x" or else end up
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-03-14 04:56:55 | Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-03-14 03:00:41 | Re: BUG #1540: Enhancement request: 'ambiguous' column reference |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-03-14 04:56:55 | Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-14 03:00:37 | Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns |