| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |
| Date: | 2006-09-14 11:05:52 |
| Message-ID: | 87mz92so6n.fsf@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Anyway, given that there's this one nonobvious gotcha, there might be
> others. My recommendation is that we take this off the open-items list
> for 8.2 and revisit it in the 8.3 cycle when there's more time.
I wonder if Theo's recent reported problem with 4.3M child xids changes the
calculus on this.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2006-09-14 11:35:06 | Re: Interesting tight loop |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-09-14 11:03:31 | Re: Interesting tight loop |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-14 12:41:51 | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-14 01:45:35 | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |