From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Trevor Hardcastle" <chizu(at)spicious(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |
Date: | 2007-04-05 03:25:52 |
Message-ID: | 87mz1njydb.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, shouldn't CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS already be including
> any indexes in the parent table?
You could argue it should for unique indexes since our unique indexes are how
we implement unique constraints. But I see no particular reason to expect it
to copy random other indexes. At least its name doesn't lead one to expect it
to.
I also thought it was sort of strange to have a command that otherwise is just
copying definitions suddenly start building whole new objects. I think I was
thinking it would be a long slow operation but I suppose creating an empty
index isn't really noticeably slow. It could print a NOTICE similar to what's
printed when you create a primary key or unique constraint.
It does mean that users would be unable to create a partition, load data, then
build indexes. Perhaps it would be nice to have an ALTER TABLE foo LIKE bar
INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS as well.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Postgres User | 2007-04-05 03:47:40 | Re: Using MS Access front-end with PG] |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-05 03:08:15 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-04-05 04:20:00 | Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-05 03:08:15 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |