From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Mouhamadou Dia" <MDia(at)accovia(dot)com>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RE : RE : BUG #3519: Postgres takes the wrong query plan resulting in performance issues |
Date: | 2007-08-07 08:40:22 |
Message-ID: | 87myx3louh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> The structure of your query is a whole series of left outer joins, the result
>> of which is then (inner) joined with one more table. The outer joins return a
>> whole lot of records but the inner join is only going to match a few of them.
>
> Hmmm ... actually I see 6 tables inside the join-tree and four more
> loose in the FROM-clause, ten relations altogether. Which means the OP
> is falling foul of from_collapse_limit, and it's not investigating every
> possible join order. Try setting from_collapse_limit to more than 10.
The three other loose ones are attached to a table inside outer joins though.
Doesn't that prevent any possibility of them being done earlier? But the first
one looks like it ought to be driving the join.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajaram J | 2007-08-07 09:23:52 | Having trouble building 64-bit pgsql 7.4.17 on HPUX ia64 |
Previous Message | Brodie Thiesfield | 2007-08-07 03:41:07 | BUG #3520: insert causing error "invalid memory alloc request size 2147483648" |