| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |
| Date: | 2007-11-24 05:39:48 |
| Message-ID: | 87myt4i4m3.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Nov 23, 2007 8:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So I'm satisfied with these results, particularly in view of the
>> fact that what we're measuring is certainly the stupidest, least
>> efficient way to use Postgres.
>
> Given the emerging world of data-driven content management systems and
> select-mostly web applications, I'd hesitate to say that select-only
> transactions aren't worth optimizing for. Regardless, glad to hear
> it's almost the same. I'll run the script again and see what it
> shows.
Surely such applications would be using prepare queries though?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-11-24 05:49:46 | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-11-24 05:18:45 | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |