Re: Odd sudden performance degradation related to temp object churn

From: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Odd sudden performance degradation related to temp object churn
Date: 2017-08-14 23:10:38
Message-ID: 87mv71eoep.fsf@jsievers.enova.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> This particular db is on 9.3.15. Recently we had a serious performance
>> degradation related to a batch job that creates 4-5 temp tables and 5
>> indexes. It is a really badly written job but what really confuses us is
>> that this job has been running for years with no issue remotely approaching
>> this one. We are also using pgpool.
>
> Did you happen to notice that this occurred when you upgrading point
> release? If so, what version did you move from/to?

The system was last started back in November. Running 9.3.15.

Not aware of any host system libs or whatever change recently but will investigate.

>
> --
> Peter Geoghegan

--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 312.241.7800

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mariel Cherkassky 2017-08-15 10:06:40 Re: performance problem on big tables
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-08-14 22:43:40 Re: Odd sudden performance degradation related to temp object churn