From: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which backend using which pg_temp_N schema? |
Date: | 2018-06-06 21:00:28 |
Message-ID: | 87muw7iqab.fsf@jsievers.enova.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> On 06/06/2018 08:54 AM, Jerry Sievers wrote:
>
>> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>
>> Yep thanks... but IMO something that simply exposes whatever internal
>> registry of temp schemas/PIDs (which I presume must exist) to DBA SQL
>> avoids any perhaps unreliable hackery such as having to scrape query
>> text from pg_stat_activity or similar.
>>
>> To wit; A long standing session might have any number of temp objects
>> existing for which records of same in the aforementioned views has long
>> since been overwritten.
>
> True assuming there is no activity against the objects or no open
> transactions.
>
> So what you interested in:
>
> 1) What created a temporary object?
Yes. Which *session*.
Thx
>
> 2) Temporary objects that are the playing at being permanent objects?
>
> 3) Both of the above?
>
>
>>
>>
--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 312.241.7800
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry Sievers | 2018-06-06 22:13:08 | Re: Slow planning time for simple query |
Previous Message | David Gauthier | 2018-06-06 20:53:14 | Re: Doing a \set through perl DBI ? |