| From: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using the %m printf format more |
| Date: | 2024-03-13 12:24:08 |
| Message-ID: | 87msr2jp5j.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:19:16AM +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> On closer look, fprintf() is actually the only errno-clobbering function
>> it calls, I was just hedging my bets in that statement.
>
> This makes the whole simpler, so I'd be OK with that. I am wondering
> if others have opinions to offer about that.
If no one chimes in in the next couple of days I'll add it to the
commitfest so it doesn't get lost.
> I've applied v2-0001 for now, as it is worth on its own and it shaves
> a bit of code.
Thanks!
- ilmari
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-03-13 13:05:00 | Re: On disable_cost |
| Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2024-03-13 12:16:09 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |