| From: | davidw(at)linuxcare(dot)com (David N(dot) Welton) |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TCL API |
| Date: | 2000-10-11 18:07:01 |
| Message-ID: | 87lmvvntfe.fsf@eugene.prosa.it |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> davidw(at)linuxcare(dot)com (David N. Welton) writes:
> >> So... how is the old Tcl API getting along? Anyone going to do a
> >> rewrite for 8.something-modern?
> > Ok, let's rephrase this - does anyone mind if *I* hack on it some? Is
> > it likely someone will have time to review my changes and commit them?
> Go for it! I don't think the tcl code has anyone particularly
> caring for it at the moment. If you want to step up and fill the
> gap, more power to you.
Ok, I will try to do what I can. I don't have a whole lot of time,
though.
> If you're thinking of API changes as opposed to just bug fixes, I'd
> suggest posting proposals on pginterfaces before you go too far with
> implementation.
Ok, for starters, here is a patch which implements a basic move to the
Obj API. I intend to start delving deeper, so I wanted to post this
before I break anything;-)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| firstpatch.diff | application/octet-stream | 27.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-10-11 18:08:15 | Re: JDBC Large ResultSet problem + BadTimeStamp Patch |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2000-10-11 17:50:06 | Re: JDBC Large ResultSet problem + BadTimeStamp Patch |