Re: inferior SCSI performance

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inferior SCSI performance
Date: 2003-10-02 08:00:22
Message-ID: 87lls483xl.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> > Unfortunately, while there are companies hawking SSDs, they are in the
> > "you'll have to talk to our salescritter for pricing" category, which
> > means that they must be ferociously expensive. :-(.
>
> the cheapest I found was the one with external backup power was ~1.8k$
> for 2GB PCI device
>
> http://www.cdw.com/shop/search/Results.aspx?key=platypus&x=0&y=0

That is pretty neat.

> An external 16GB one with battery backup and
> write-t-small-ide-drives-on-power-failure was ~25k$

And they scale up from there. This company has one that goes up to 1TB RAM.
4.5kW power consumption? I hate to see what kind of heat that thing generates.

http://www.imperialtech.com/pdf/MRSpec_021803.pdf

I have no idea what price the monster unit is, but someone described the price
of one of the *lesser* units as "made me physically ill". So I can only imagine.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ang Chin Han 2003-10-02 08:54:09 Re: inferior SCSI performance
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2003-10-02 07:13:53 Re: inferior SCSI performance