Re: Trigger question

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: Harald Fuchs <hf99(at)protecting(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trigger question
Date: 2004-01-20 15:17:24
Message-ID: 87llo2hcor.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
> I didn't think they'd be meaningful for a statement-level
> trigger. Surely OLD/NEW are by definition row-level details.

Granted; the feature in question is *some* means of accessing the
result set of a statement-level trigger -- it probably would not use
the same UI (i.e. OLD/NEW) that row-level triggers use.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-01-20 16:02:29 Re: Trigger question
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-01-20 08:13:56 Re: Trigger question