From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |
Date: | 2004-10-12 00:57:20 |
Message-ID: | 87llec3g9b.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, I have applied the following patch that uses Cygwin native symlink()
> instead of the Win32 junctions. The reason for this is that Cygwin
> symlinks work on Win95/98/ME where junction points do not
Is this really a Win95/98/ME vs NT distinction or a FAT32 vs NTFS distinction?
In which case does an NT machine that happens to be using a FAT32 file system
have the same problem?
> and we have no way to know what system will be running the Cygwin binaries
Is there a reason to make this a compile-time decision? Can't it just try to
make a junction and if it fails then use the Cygwin symlink?
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-12 01:06:26 | Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |
Previous Message | Reini Urban | 2004-10-11 23:42:34 | Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-10-12 01:04:23 | Re: Unit testing |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-10-12 00:56:11 | Re: CVS fixed ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-12 01:06:26 | Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |
Previous Message | Reini Urban | 2004-10-11 23:42:34 | Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |