From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Viewing non-system objects in psql |
Date: | 2005-06-16 21:23:06 |
Message-ID: | 87ll5a8091.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> I maintain that it makes more sense for those few people who regularly look
> at system functions to add a "S" than to have everyone else have to do
> things such as "\df public."
@@aol(me too).
fwiw, i think "few" may be a bit optimistic here. Don't forget you can do
things like this if you forget what arguments array_lower takes:
db=> \df array_lower
List of functions
Result data type | Schema | Name | Argument data types
------------------+------------+-------------+---------------------
integer | pg_catalog | array_lower | anyarray, integer
(1 row)
Or this to get a list of all the standard array functions.
db=> \df array_*
P.S. The use of capital "s" is possible a source of some of the resistance. It
seems like a lowercase "s" or something else that doesn't need multiple
keystrokes would be a lot easier to type. Is there some limitation on the
\command parser that makes \dfs harder?
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2005-06-16 22:22:16 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Previous Message | Douglas McNaught | 2005-06-16 20:54:11 | Re: pgavd status |