| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Anthony Molinaro" <amolinaro(at)wgen(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)MIT(dot)EDU>, "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, "Rick Schumeyer" <rschumeyer(at)ieee(dot)org>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg, mysql comparison with "group by" clause |
| Date: | 2005-10-14 07:21:01 |
| Message-ID: | 87ll0wh8de.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
"Anthony Molinaro" <amolinaro(at)wgen(dot)net> writes:
> More awkward? What *you're* suggesting is more awkward. You realize that
> right? How can syntax that is understood and accepted for years be more
> awkward?
Well gosh, I would say that that's something only a newbie could say about
SQL of all things...
I had a whole thing written after that but I just deleted it. I grow tired of
this thread.
I am pretty happy to hear that the SQL standard endorsed the idea having the
right thing happen if the primary key is present in the grouping list. That
would be a wonderful feature for Postgres.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2005-10-14 07:25:43 | Re: copy tables |
| Previous Message | Shavonne Marietta Wijesinghe | 2005-10-14 06:54:39 | copy tables |