From: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Rethinking stats communication mechanisms |
Date: | 2006-06-18 12:57:43 |
Message-ID: | 87lkruvcxk.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> writes:
>
>> Yeah, but if you turn on query logging in that case you'll see the
>> bajillions of short queries, so you don't need the accurate snapshot
>> to diagnose that.
>
> Query logging on a production OLTP machine? a) that would be a huge
> performance drain on the production system b) it would produce so much logging
> that it would take a significant amount of disk and i/o resources just to
> handle and c) you would need to implement special purpose tools just to make
> sense of these huge logs.
(a) and (b): of course you would only do it on a temporary basis for
problem diagnosis. We do that with our production apps where I work
(when absolutely necessary).
(c): Perl. :)
Ideally, you'd find the query storm problem in load testing before you
ever got to production. I hope to someday visit that planet--it must
be nice.
-Doug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-06-18 13:02:31 | Unable to initdb using HEAD on Windows XP |
Previous Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2006-06-18 09:17:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL |