Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error
Date: 2007-07-12 08:57:40
Message-ID: 87lkdmov7f.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Seems like we could be slightly more friendly without too much bother:
>
> Actually, rather than get into that sort of AI-complete project,

Is it really AI-complete? ISTM the *only* place where a parameter is allowed
is where the parser inserts a ColumnRef node?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-07-12 09:46:46 Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-07-12 07:53:16 Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-07-12 09:04:09 Re: "tuple concurrently updated" during index deletion
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-07-12 08:19:09 Re: 2PC-induced lockup