From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error |
Date: | 2007-07-12 08:57:40 |
Message-ID: | 87lkdmov7f.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Seems like we could be slightly more friendly without too much bother:
>
> Actually, rather than get into that sort of AI-complete project,
Is it really AI-complete? ISTM the *only* place where a parameter is allowed
is where the parser inserts a ColumnRef node?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-07-12 09:46:46 | Re: Postgres 8.2 binary for ubuntu 6.10? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-12 07:53:16 | Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-12 09:04:09 | Re: "tuple concurrently updated" during index deletion |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-12 08:19:09 | Re: 2PC-induced lockup |