| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
| Date: | 2007-09-01 18:31:38 |
| Message-ID: | 87lkbqjkz9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> I think security definer functions should automatically inherit their
>> search_path. The whole "secure by default" thing.
>
> This assumes that the search path at creation time has something to do
> with the path you'd like to use at execution, which is unlikely to be
> the case in existing pg_dump output, to name one example. I don't
> really want to get into doing the above.
pg_dump will have to do a ALTER FUNCTION SET command anyways, no? So the
default search_path that gets saved doesn't really matter. In general if it's
not the search path you want at run-time you just have to change it, but you
should always have *something* set or else it's a wide open security hole.
I'm not clear why the search path at creation time is such a bad choice
anyways, it is security "definer", what's the difference between taking the
userid from the defining environment and taking the search path from the
defining environment?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-09-01 18:40:04 | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
| Previous Message | ohp | 2007-09-01 18:15:03 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the |