| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: searching bison guru - grouping sets implementation |
| Date: | 2008-08-05 14:18:41 |
| Message-ID: | 87ljzb8rzy.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I don't know how that should be resolved, or if it's a genuine ambiguity in the
> ANSI and PostgreSQL syntax or something that can be fixed with some Bison
> magic.
Fwiw I looked into this once already and noted the same conflict:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/83563/match=rollup
Tom pointed out that there's more than one way to skin a cat:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.cvs/22326/focus=83563
(Oh look at that, he actually used precisely that phrase)
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-08-05 14:20:49 | Re: searching bison guru - grouping sets implementation |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-08-05 14:17:53 | Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |