| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268) |
| Date: | 2008-12-12 16:57:30 |
| Message-ID: | 87ljuls551.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Obviously sandwhiching two values in one column is not going to work.
> The only question here is whether it's important to simultaneously
> support both DAC and MAC. As far as I can see, KaiGai is the only one
> arguing that we don't need to do that (except for Tom, who doesn't
> like either feature). If anyone else agrees with his position, now
> would be a good time to speak up.
Well maybe I'm not following. I think it's strange to need two different
row-based security methods. Can you give some examples of how you would use
these two mechanisms together?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-12-12 16:58:14 | Re: benchmarking the query planner |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2008-12-12 16:56:46 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |