Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes
Date: 2010-12-20 08:56:33
Message-ID: 87lj3k6cvy.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I bet it doesn't. The *postmaster* never connects to a database, so
> which copy of pg_extension does it ever read?

None, which does it need to read? My answer is none, you're saying it's
wrong, I don't get why. postmaster surely has no business with what's in
a specific database and no use at all of placeholder GUCs, right?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-20 08:58:58 Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-12-20 08:17:27 Re: Timeout for asynchronous replication Re: Timeout and wait-forever in sync rep