| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Odd 9.4, 9.3 buildfarm failure on s390x |
| Date: | 2018-09-29 23:38:46 |
| Message-ID: | 87lg7jev6j.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> What is the size of a C "int" on this platform?
Andrew> 4.
Hmm.
Because int being more than 32 bits is the simplest explanation for this
difference.
How about the output of this query:
with d(a) as (values ('11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid),
('22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222'::uuid),
('3f3e3c3b-3a30-3938-3736-353433a2313e'::uuid))
select d1.a, d2.a, uuid_cmp(d1.a,d2.a) from d d1, d d2
order by d1.a asc, d2.a desc;
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-09-30 00:45:01 | Re: libpq host/hostaddr/conninfo inconsistencies |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-09-29 23:07:29 | Re: Implementing SQL ASSERTION |