From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Donald Dong <xdong(at)csumb(dot)edu>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Ryu floating point output patch |
Date: | 2019-02-17 16:19:05 |
Message-ID: | 87lg2ejsy8.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> b) new command-line option, e.g. pg_dump --extra-float-digits=0
>> This is probably the safest option, IMO. Any preferences as to the
>> option name?
Tom> I like that too, assuming that it can be made to fit into the
Tom> structure of the cross-version-upgrade tests (which would have
Tom> to know to use it only with >= v12 pg_dump).
Tom> --extra-float-digits seems fine as a name.
As far as I can tell, test.sh only uses the new version's pg_dump (in
fact the only binaries directly used from the old version are initdb and
pg_ctl).
... wait, this initdb in test.sh is using an option that doesn't exist
before pg11? Is the cross-version test actually using some different
script? Andrew?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2019-02-17 16:29:56 | Re: Actual Cost |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-17 16:09:27 | Re: CPU costs of random_zipfian in pgbench |