From: | Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | joe(at)jwebmedia(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Way to use count() and LIMIT? |
Date: | 2001-12-18 19:27:10 |
Message-ID: | 87k7vke3ch.fsf@npa01zz001.simplot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sure, just declare a cursor. Here's a simple one that I use:
DECLARE raw_data CURSOR FOR
SELECT
(SELECT pc FROM curpack1 WHERE curpack1.dt <= caseweights1.dt
ORDER BY curpack1.dt DESC LIMIT 1) AS "pc",
dt::date AS "date",
dt::time AS "time",
weight AS "weight"
FROM caseweights1
WHERE dt >= '%s' AND
dt < '%s'
ORDER BY dt;
Then you simply fetch from this cursor (like so):
FETCH FORWARD 20 IN raw_data;
And you close it with a simple:
CLOSE raw_data;
Jason
Joe Koenig <joe(at)jwebmedia(dot)com> writes:
> Is there a way to structure a query so you can only run 1 query, get the
> full number of rows that would be returned, but then use LIMIT to step
> through in groups of 20? For example, a search in my CD's/Rock section
> will return 53,000 results. I want to give the user the number of total
> results, but also use LIMIT to go through 20 at a time? Does this
> require 2 queries? Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | SHELTON,MICHAEL (Non-HP-Boise,ex1) | 2001-12-18 20:18:13 | Re: Way to use count() and LIMIT? |
Previous Message | Joe Koenig | 2001-12-18 18:04:00 | Way to use count() and LIMIT? |