From: | Laurent Martelli <laurent(at)bearteam(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Join on incompatible types |
Date: | 2003-11-18 10:01:48 |
Message-ID: | 87k75ym1v7.fsf@news.nerim.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "scott" == scott marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
[...]
scott> Note here:
scott> Merge Join (cost=1788.68..4735.71 rows=1 width=85) (actual
scott> time=597.540..1340.526 rows=20153 loops=1) Merge Cond:
scott> ("outer".id = "inner".id)
scott> This estimate is WAY off. Are both of those fields indexed
scott> and analyzed? Have you tried upping the statistics target on
scott> those two fields? I assume they are compatible types.
Should I understand that a join on incompatible types (such as integer
and varchar) may lead to bad performances ?
--
Laurent Martelli
laurent(at)aopsys(dot)com Java Aspect Components
http://www.aopsys.com/ http://jac.aopsys.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-11-18 10:45:41 | Re: Join on incompatible types |
Previous Message | Ryszard Lach | 2003-11-18 09:16:46 | Re: duration logging setting in 7.4 |