Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-18 16:39:56
Message-ID: 87k5u1md2b.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> It's case-sensitive. We had that argument already, but I still think
> this decision was wrong.

I thought the consensus was that it should change.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-18 16:44:45 Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-06-18 16:38:55 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent