From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Moving to postgresql and some ignorant questions |
Date: | 2007-08-14 19:49:33 |
Message-ID: | 87k5rxoq0i.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There are some cases where I would like to bunch queries into a
> transaction purely for speed purposes, but they're not interdependent
> for integrity. E.g.,
How do you know you need to do this for speed if you haven't run it yet? I
would suggest you build your application around the application needs first,
then later look at how to optimize it.
Remember the two rules of optimization:
1) Don't
2) (for experts only) Don't yet
The only case where you should consider batching together transactions like
that is if you're processing a batch data load of some kind. In that case you
have a large volume of updates and they're all single-threaded. But usually in
that case you want to abort the whole load if you have a problem.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kirk Wythers | 2007-08-14 20:10:15 | query help |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-14 19:36:00 | Re: pqlib in c++: PQconnectStart PQconnectPoll |