From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Extensions User Design |
Date: | 2009-07-01 15:04:39 |
Message-ID: | 87k52sxx4o.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have zero interest in trying to support either. I doubt it's even
> possible --- the backend code has no way to inform the dynamic loader
> how to resolve cross-library references. So if the DL doesn't already
> understand the dependency it's never going to work.
Ok, that means less work for the extension facility (it was not
targetted for it's first incarnation anyway) stuff.
FWIW, I had in mind to use the dependancy information in the extension
meta-data to issue more than one "dlopen()" when a plugin function is
called. I'm being told that in my case linking uuid-ossp.so against
uuid.so should do the trick, though.
I'll drop the idea off the scope of the extension facility.
Regards,
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Caleb Cushing | 2009-07-01 15:19:48 | single bit integer (TINYINT) revisited for 8.5 |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-01 14:48:37 | Re: Did COPY performance regression solve in 8.4rc2? |