Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Date: 2018-04-08 07:31:48
Message-ID: 87k1tignsc.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:

Alvaro> Thanks for cleaning that up. I'll look into why the test
Alvaro> (without this commit) fails with force_parallel_mode=regress
Alvaro> next week.

Seems clear enough to me - the "Heap Fetches" statistic is kept in the
IndexOnlyScanState node in its own field, not part of ss.ps.instrument,
and is therefore not reported from workers to leader.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2018-04-08 07:55:30 Re: pgsql: Support index INCLUDE in the AM properties interface.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-08 06:37:34 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2018-04-08 07:34:02 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in create_gather_path
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-08 06:37:34 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time