Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: David Helgason <david(at)uti(dot)is>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
Date: 2004-02-04 19:22:05
Message-ID: 87isim1wgy.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Helgason <david(at)uti(dot)is> writes:
> I needed these, so I went and implemented them myself.

I didn't see any followup to this: do we want to include this in the
main tree, contrib/, or not at all?

-Neil (who has no opinion on the matter, but just wants to make sure
this doesn't fall through the cracks)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2004-02-04 19:36:33 Re: implemented missing bitSetBit() and bitGetBit()
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-02-04 19:06:29 Re: array surprising behavior