Re: GiST rtree logic is not right

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GiST rtree logic is not right
Date: 2005-06-23 22:54:29
Message-ID: 87is04y996.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> It would be a lot easier to sell that if it gave the right answers ;-)

Of course given that the real rtree index gives the wrong answers perhaps
moving rtree_gist into core (after fixing this) is just a bug fix :)

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-23 23:38:20 Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-06-23 22:53:47 Re: Fixing r-tree semantics