From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor |
Date: | 2006-04-11 17:15:33 |
Message-ID: | 87irpgjaoa.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> An idea arising in chat with Joshua Drake: the retargetting code, if it
> turns out to work and not be excessively expensive, could also be useful
> to implement a server-side "connection pooling" of sorts: the postmaster
> could keep idle backends and retarget them to a database that receives
> an incoming connection. However, we'd also need a mechanism to clean
> all backend state previous to reusing a connection, to leave it "as
> new" (no prepared statements, WITH HOLD cursors, etc.)
Isn't all that work pretty much exactly the main cost of starting a new
backend?
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-04-11 17:19:55 | Re: RH9 postgresql 8.0.7 rpm |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-04-11 16:46:47 | Re: plpgsql by default |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-04-11 17:20:19 | Re: Support Parallel Query Execution in Executor |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-11 16:42:23 | Re: Patch proposal for log_duration |